"functus officio" meaning in English

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "la",
        "3": "functus"
      },
      "expansion": "Latin functus",
      "name": "bor"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Latin functus officio (“having performed one's duty”).",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-",
        "nolink": "1"
      },
      "expansion": "functus officio (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Latin links with redundant wikilinks",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Law",
          "orig": "en:Law",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              51,
              66
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2021 September 24, Nicolas Kasirer, “Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Manitoba, 2021 SCC 33”, in CanLII, retrieved 25 Feb 2025:",
          "text": "A court loses jurisdiction, and is thus said to be functus officio, once the formal judgment has been entered […] After this point, the court is understood only to have the power to amend the judgment in very limited circumstances, such as where there is a statutory basis to do so, where necessary to correct an error in expressing its manifest intention, or where the matter has not been heard on its merits.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "(of a judge etc.) Having completed one's involvement in a matter (e.g. at the end of a court case), so that one no longer has jurisdiction to revisit it."
      ],
      "id": "en-functus_officio-en-adj-dhFa5-yo",
      "links": [
        [
          "law",
          "law#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(law) (of a judge etc.) Having completed one's involvement in a matter (e.g. at the end of a court case), so that one no longer has jurisdiction to revisit it."
      ],
      "synonyms": [
        {
          "word": "functus"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "law"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "functus officio"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "la",
        "3": "functus"
      },
      "expansion": "Latin functus",
      "name": "bor"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From Latin functus officio (“having performed one's duty”).",
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "-",
        "nolink": "1"
      },
      "expansion": "functus officio (not comparable)",
      "name": "en-adj"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "adj",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English adjectives",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English multiword terms",
        "English terms borrowed from Latin",
        "English terms derived from Latin",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncomparable adjectives",
        "Latin links with redundant wikilinks",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Law"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "bold_text_offsets": [
            [
              51,
              66
            ]
          ],
          "ref": "2021 September 24, Nicolas Kasirer, “Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Manitoba, 2021 SCC 33”, in CanLII, retrieved 25 Feb 2025:",
          "text": "A court loses jurisdiction, and is thus said to be functus officio, once the formal judgment has been entered […] After this point, the court is understood only to have the power to amend the judgment in very limited circumstances, such as where there is a statutory basis to do so, where necessary to correct an error in expressing its manifest intention, or where the matter has not been heard on its merits.",
          "type": "quotation"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "(of a judge etc.) Having completed one's involvement in a matter (e.g. at the end of a court case), so that one no longer has jurisdiction to revisit it."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "law",
          "law#English"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(law) (of a judge etc.) Having completed one's involvement in a matter (e.g. at the end of a court case), so that one no longer has jurisdiction to revisit it."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "not-comparable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "law"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "synonyms": [
    {
      "word": "functus"
    }
  ],
  "word": "functus officio"
}